QQsci-skill/references/literature-routing.md

Literature Routing with Zotero Notes and DeepSeek

Use this file when the user wants existing Zotero/Obsidian literature notes to guide manuscript positioning, rewriting, citation planning, or reviewer-risk analysis.

Inputs

Collect as many as available:

• manuscript title, abstract, draft, figure captions, or key claims
• material system and aliases
• material family, device type, application, mechanism, and performance metrics
• target journal or journal tier
• Zotero collection, tag, saved search, Obsidian folder, or note source
• whether the notes were generated by DeepSeek/AwesomeGPT

If no target journal is given, ask the author. If they want recommendations, open journal-positioning.md.

Keyword extraction

Extract keywords in layers:

1. Exact material: e.g. Ni-HHTP, MXene, BC, perovskite, MOF, COF, Ecoflex, graphene, hydrogel.
2. Material family: conductive MOF, 2D material, porous polymer, aerogel, biomass cellulose, elastomer composite, metal oxide, sulfide, carbide.
3. Device/application: TENG, sensor, battery, supercapacitor, electrocatalysis, photocatalysis, membrane, flexible electronics, photodetector.
4. Mechanism: charge transfer, ion transport, defect engineering, interface polarization, hydrogen bonding, hydrophilicity, mechanical reinforcement, piezoelectricity, triboelectric polarity, carrier separation.
5. Evidence: XPS, XRD, Raman, SEM/TEM, AFM, EIS, CV, LSV, tensile, fatigue, cycling stability, humidity/temperature tests.
6. Target outlet: journal name, publisher family, impact level, audience.

Return a query pack:

• must-match: exact material, device, mechanism
• should-match: family, application, evidence type
• context: target journal, field, benchmark terms
• exclude: irrelevant homonyms or unrelated applications

DeepSeek screening brief

Give DeepSeek a compact, structured task:

You are screening my existing Zotero/Obsidian literature notes for a materials
science manuscript.

Manuscript profile:
- Material/system: xxx
- Material family: xxx
- Device/application: xxx
- Mechanism/property: xxx
- Target journal or tier: xxx
- Key evidence/figures: xxx

Screen the notes and return:
1. Strongly related papers: same material, same device, same mechanism, direct
   benchmark, or same target-journal positioning.
2. Weakly related papers: same material family, adjacent device/application,
   similar mechanism, characterization logic, or useful writing pattern.
3. For each paper: title, year, journal, DOI, Zotero key if present, relation
   type, useful claim/evidence, and why it matters for my manuscript.
4. Do not include papers only because of a broad keyword match.

Strong vs weak relation rules

Strongly related:

• same exact material or named composite
• same material family and same device/application
• same mechanism tested with comparable evidence
• same target journal or immediate competitor journal with close topic
• benchmark paper that reviewers will expect
• paper that directly defines the gap or limitation being addressed

Weakly related:

• same material family but different device
• same device but different material
• similar characterization chain
• similar introduction structure or mechanism language
• adjacent application with transferable design logic
• broader review or perspective useful for field framing

Reject:

• title-only matches with no useful mechanism or benchmark
• papers outside the application without transferable logic
• notes with insufficient metadata unless the user asks to repair metadata

How to use results in writing

Strong papers:

• define novelty and gap
• anchor Introduction claims
• support direct benchmark comparison
• guide reviewer-risk fixes
• decide which references must be cited near major claims
• provide DOI-only Word comments when the user asks for citation placement in .docx

Weak papers:

• broaden first Introduction paragraph
• provide mechanism vocabulary
• support cautious analogies
• suggest missing controls or characterization
• inspire section architecture

Output template

Keyword pack:

Strongly related papers:

Weakly related papers:

How this changes the manuscript:

Citation/positioning risks:

Word citation comments

When the final deliverable is an annotated Word manuscript, separate internal planning from comment text.

Internal planning may include title, authors, Zotero key, relation type, and why the paper supports the claim.

The Word comment itself must contain DOI strings only:

10.xxxx/xxxxx
10.xxxx/yyyyy

Do not include explanations in the Word comment. Omit papers without DOI unless the user explicitly allows title or Zotero-key fallback.